 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
Re: They are NOT random timing maps. They are the timing |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
Kenny on November 01, 2005 at 11:02 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 80 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
They are NOT random timing maps. They are the timing posted by Ash's Z on November 01, 2005 at 10:14 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
maps associated with the vehicles listed with dynocharts in my original post. You have the A/F, you have the ignition timing. Those are the primary two factors involved when tuning a car on the dyno. Another thing you are completely overlooking is the fact that other tuners that use AFCs are actually throwing the timing all over the place when the add/deduct fuel delivery to get the A/F curve where they want it. This is clearly a less-than-best way to tune a car. I tune for A/F and ignition timing sepereately, which is truly the only correct way to do it. Please tell me what other parameters you would like and why you feel they are a requirement in order for you to see that my tunes are solid. I will happily provide such data, and I will happily continue to entertain your questions until you understand all of the elements of tuning. I never made any objective judgement of your tunes, I merely stated the facts surrounding the situation, that should be pretty clear to you. You are changing the subject of my initial point. I'm sure your tuning looks great on paper, not that I'd be the one to make that judgement either way. I'm not going to argue the minutia of tuning with you Ash, as I'm sure you can brow-beat me eventually and it has nothing to do with my initial point in this post. Regardless of your timing maps, dyno charts and AFs most of the engines in your dyno parade still blew, and that was my point.
mkay?
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
 SteamyZ. Never had did me wrong. - SL103 07/06/04 11:58:15 |
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
20:41:10 11/01/05
